Breach of Confidence: Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets | Freed Legal Services
Helpful?
Yes No Share to Facebook

Breach of Confidence:

Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets



Last Updated: August 22 2026

Question: In Ontario, can a paralegal help me if someone misused my confidential business information, like a recipe or process, without permission?

Answer: Freed Legal Services can help you assess whether your situation may fit the elements of breach of confidence, including whether the information had the necessary quality of confidence, was communicated in confidence, and was later misused, which Canadian courts describe in Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574.  If you want to protect your rights and understand next steps, contact Freed Legal Services at (800) 716-1897 for a free 1/2 hour consultation in Ontario.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources


Misused Business Secrets

The success of a business may rely heavily upon secret recipes, proprietary software, unique systems, and customized processes; and accordingly, information relating to these key aspects may be highly valued with misuse of such confidential information quite harmful. In tort law, breach of confidence involves the wrongful use of information that was openly shared with the party that subsequently misuses the secretive information; and in this respect, breach of confidence differs from theft of trade secrets which would involve an element of misappropriation.

The Law

As per the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, a Supreme Court decision, the elements that must be proven within a breach of confidence case are:

  • The information conveyed was confidential;
  • The information was communicated in confidence; and
  • The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:


I can deal quite briefly with the breach of confidence issue.  I have already indicated that Lac breached a duty of confidence owed to Corona.  The test for whether there has been a breach of confidence is not seriously disputed by the parties.  It consists in establishing three elements:  that the information conveyed was confidential, that it was communicated in confidence, and that it was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.  In Coco v. A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd., [1969] R.P.C. 41 (Ch.), Megarry J.  (as he then was) put it as follows at p. 47:

In my judgment, three elements are normally required if, apart from contract, a case of breach of confidence is to succeed.  First, the information itself, in the words of Lord Greene, M.R. in the Saltman case on page 215, must "have the necessary quality of confidence about it."  Secondly, that information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence.  Thirdly, there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it . .  .

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.

Get a FREE ½ HOUR CONSULTATION

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
6

NOTE: A considerable quantity of online searches featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” typically signifies a demand for prompt and competent legal assistance, rather than a specific job title.  In Ontario, “licensed paralegals” are governed by the same Law Society that supervises lawyers and have the authority to represent clients in specific litigation cases.  Key elements of this role include advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural expertise.  Freed Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed framework, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and persuasive advocacy aimed at securing effective and positive outcomes for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Freed Legal Services

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Freed Legal Services. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.217.113
Freed Legal Services

2800 Skymark Avenue, Suite 200
Mississauga, Ontario,
L4W 5A6
 
P: (800) 716-1897

Hours of Business:

09:00AM - 09:00PM
09:00AM - 09:00PM
09:00AM - 09:00PM
09:00AM - 09:00PM
09:00AM - 09:00PM
09:00AM - 09:00PM
09:00AM - 09:00PM
Sunday:
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:
Saturday:

By appointment only.  Call for details.
Messages may be left anytime.









Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A