Yes No Share to Facebook
Limiting Laundry Access:
Disruptive Changes to Use of Laundry Facilities
Last Updated: July 03 2026
Question: Can a landlord limit when I can use laundry facilities in my apartment in Ontario if my lease says I can access them twice per week?
Answer: In Ontario, a licensed paralegal at Freed Legal Services can help you review your lease and the Landlord and Tenant Board facts to assess whether limiting laundry access interferes with your reasonable enjoyment, even if the landlord claims it is meant to reduce tenant tensions; the decision in JD v. LD’S, 2017 CanLII 28729 shows the Board can order compensation and a rent abatement when a landlord unilaterally restricts shared amenities beyond what the lease allows, including changing access from twice per week to a fixed Sunday window, which can force tenants to incur extra costs. If you’re dealing with restricted laundry access in Ontario, contact Freed Legal Services at (800) 716-1897 for a free 30-minute or half-hour consultation to discuss next steps and document what the lease allows, what changed, and how the restriction affected you.
Decision Summary: JD v. LD'S, CET-63203-16 (Re)
The case of JD v. LD'S, 2017 CanLII 28729, provides an important decision from the Landlord and Tenant Board regarding the improper interference or disruption with the use of laundry facilities by the landlord. The legal dispute between the landlord and the tenant arose after the landlord attempted to alter laundry facilities access despite that the lease agreement expressly stated that the tenant, JG, could access the laundry facilities twice per week by contacting the upstairs tenants. The landlord, despite the twice per week term within the lease agreement, attempted to impose a condition that access to the laundry facilities be limted to a three-hour period, once per week, and only on Sunday.
Factual Details
In June 2016, new tenants moved upstairs. Subsequently, LD's restricted laundry access to Sundays between 11:00AM and 2:00PM. As JG worked in construction and needed to do laundry regularly, JG faced difficulties with the new schedule and needed to use a laundromat to supplement the unilaterally imposed once-a-week laundry access.
Decision Reasons
The Landlord Tenant Board found that the change in laundry arrangements significantly interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the property by the tenant. The shift to a fixed time on Sundays for laundry use represented a substantial interference compared to the previous arrangement without any time restrictions. While the Landlord Tenant Board acknowledged that the landlord was imposing the laundry access restrictions for the purpose of mediating tensions between tenants, the Landlord Tenant Board ruled in favour of JG.
Remedy Granted
The Landlord Tenant Board granted $200.00 for laundry costs as compensation to the tenant. Additionally, the Landlord Tenant Board awarded a rent abatement of ten percent per month for six months to the tenant.
Full Case
The official case judgment is available here: JD v. LD's, 2017 CanLII 28729
Conclusion
This decision in this case shows that even when a landlord is imposing a change in access to amenities for the purpose of relieving tensions between tenants, the imposition remains as an interference in the rights of the tenant.
NOTE: A significant quantity of inquiries related to “lawyers nearby” or “top lawyer in” frequently indicates an urgent necessity for proficient legal representation instead of a particular professional designation. In Ontario, licensed paralegals are governed by the same Law Society that oversees lawyers and are empowered to act on behalf of clients in specified litigation matters. Skills in advocacy, legal analysis, and procedural know-how are fundamental to that position. Freed Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed parameters, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and persuasive advocacy aimed at securing effective and advantageous resolutions for clients.

